Dear Mr. Efroni,
I am aware that administrative detention is permitted under international law but with strict conditions. It should only be used as a last resort and on an individual, case-by-case basis. Only imperative reasons of security justify the use of administrative detention and it should not be used as a substitute for criminal prosecution when there is insufficient evidence. This is obviously not the case for Israel which uses administrative detention in such a systematic manner that makes a mockery of international law.
There are a number of reasons why Israel’s use of administrative detention does not meet international standards, including:
-Israel widely practices the use of torture and corporal punishment and deports and incarcerates administrative detainees outside the Occupied Palestinian Territory;
- Israel uses administrative detention as a form of collective punishment and widely engages in humiliating and degrading treatment of administrative detainees;
- Administrative detainees are usually not informed precisely of the reasons for their detention;
- Israel uses administrative detention as a substitute for criminal prosecution when evidence is insufficient or non-existent
- Israel holds administrative detainees for prolonged periods in contravention of the 4th Geneva Convention, which mandates that administrative detention take place for a very brief period of time
- In the case of child detainees, Israel regularly fails to take into account the best interests of the child as required under international law.
For these reasons, among others, I again reiterate my demand for Israel to cease its use of administrative detention which Israel uses as a colonial tool of oppression.
I look forward to hearing from you in very near future.
Regards,
[signature]
Comments are closed.